About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

Tulsa Geological Society


Tulsa Geological Society Digest
Vol. 32 (1964), Pages 166-167

The Future of Petroleum Geologists in the United States: Abstract

Warren B. Weeks1


The future for the petroleum geologist in the United States lies wholly in his own hands. If he is waiting for "better times," he has lost the battle. If he is constantly expanding his knowledge and maintains faith in his ability to exploit that knowledge, he has a rosy future.

We as professional petroleum geologists are inseparably tied to an increasingly complex industry. The foremost objective of the oil industry, as with all industries, is to serve the public. To do so it must make a profit that will justify the amount of capital or investment required to establish and maintain the industry. Sometimes we, the hunters, may forget that this industry is entirely dependent upon the raw material which we are continually trying to discover. We can't forget, nor can we let the industry and the public forget, that oil and gas are the prime requirements for fuel and petrochemicals.

At the turn of this century, U. S. developed reserves were less than 3 billion bbls. of oil and we had produced less than 1 billion bbls. Total accumulated production and reserves were less than 3.4 billion bbls. This figure had only doubled by the end of 1910, when the professional petroleum geologist was beginning to make his presence felt. During the next 52 years, it rose 16 times to more than 113 billion bbls, over half of which has been developed during the past 20 years. The years 1957, 1962 and 1963 were the only years since 1943 in which newly developed reserves of liquid hydrocarbons did not equal production.

On the other hand, by 1910 we had only recorded production of some 35 trillion cu. ft. of natural gas. During the next 52 years, gas production amounted to over 200 trillion cu. ft. and reserves stood at 274 trillion.

Although the professional petroleum geologist can take a reasonable share of the credit for the discovery and development of these reserves, they represent the teamwork of invested capital, proficient management, diverse professions, and labor.

It appears that in this country we may have reached or neared the peak of petroleum productive capacity following some 30 years of very efficient discovery capacity. You can hear estimates of ultimate recoverable oil reserves for the U. S. running from 140 to 2,000 billion bbls. Future gas reserves have been estimated at from twice to eight times the present reserve (274 trillion cu. ft.).

It can be reasoned that the shallower and more cheaply found and developed reserves have largely been discovered. Not all, but most, future discoveries of importance must come (a) from the deeper portions of known basins, (b) obscure stratigraphic traps, (c) costly offshore exploration, and (d) remote unexplored areas. The petroleum geologist need have little worry about his place in the scheme of things. He will be, in increasing quantity and quality, an operating necessity to the well being of the petroleum industry and the nation. There are certain clear signs for his future. First, he can rest assured there will be an increasing demand for energy from hydrocarbons. The percentage increase is not important—there will be a market for an ever-growing supply of energy.

Secondly, the geologist must find these hydrocarbons under deeper and more hazardous drilling conditions, in remote and inaccessible areas, and in obscure stratigraphic traps. This will require a large number of holes. All of this can only add up to larger exploration costs.

Thirdly, no relief can be expected in the price situation for liquid hydrocarbons. The excess supply outside our borders within the next decade will be a strong deterrent to any domestic price increases. A rise in price would make competitive the vast quantities of hydrocarbon liquids in the tar sands, oil shales, and coals. The price ceiling which we have now must be lived with for some time.

Since we can't expect an increase in the price received for oil, and no decrease in the costs to develop and operate, where will the exploration money come from? There remain two ways to obtain the necessary increased exploration funds.

1. Obtain gas prices in line with the cost of finding, developing and producing gas and commensurate with its value as a fuel compared to other fuels. This is a political and consumer relations problem, requiring a great effort on the part of industry employees in educating others.

2. To compete successfully with foreign oil, we must develop our fields at a lesser cost by drilling fewer holes. It behooves us as geologists to continually strive for regulations and legislation that will allow wider development spacing, and allowable production rates which will provide economic incentive for wide well spacing.

Geologists have paid court to the words "stratigraphy," "sedimentation," and "lithology" for years, but only recently has the profession started to tie them together in a bundle and use this to develop knowledge that is understandable and useful in searching for the elusive "stratigraphic trap." The industry and the profession now have the tools and know-how to organize as concerted a search for "strat traps" as has been the hunt for structures the past 30 years. These two requisites can be combined to find ample hydrocarbons on this continent during the next generation to fill the needs of the following generation. The will-o-the-wisp "little black box" is in our head, and is not the gadget modern alchemists are searching for.


Acknowledgments and Associated Footnotes

1 Phillips, Bartlesville, Okla.

December 2, 1963

Copyright © 2006 by the Tulsa Geological Society